Kent v. Armistead

Supreme Court of Virginia

Kent v. Armistead

4 Munf. 72, 18 Va. 72, 1813 Va. LEXIS 24

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

DecidedMarch 20, 1813

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 4 Munf. 72 (Kent v. Armistead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kent v. Armistead, 4 Munf. 72, 18 Va. 72, 1813 Va. LEXIS 24 (Va. 1813).

Pincite

Opinion

The president pronounced the court’s opinion, “that, (without deciding either of the points stated in the bills of exceptions,) the declaration is insufficient to support the action ; it not being stated therein that the slave in question belonged to, or was the property of the plaintiff, now defendant.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The president pronounced the court’s opinion, “that, (without deciding either of the points stated in the bills of exceptions,) the declaration is insufficient to support the action ; it not being stated therein that the slave in question belonged to, or was the property of the plaintiff, now defendant.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Munf. 72, 18 Va. 72, 1813 Va. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kent-v-armistead-va-1813.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack