Kent v. Armistead

Supreme Court of Virginia

Kent v. Armistead

4 Munf. 72, 18 Va. 72, 1813 Va. LEXIS 24

Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided March 20, 1813·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The president pronounced the court’s opinion, “that, (without deciding either of the points stated in the bills of exceptions,) the declaration is insufficient to support the action ; it not being stated therein that the slave in question belonged to, or was the property of the plaintiff, now defendant.” (1.)

Judgment reversed, and entered in favour of the plaintiff in error.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The president pronounced the court’s opinion, “that, (without deciding either of the points stated in the bills of exceptions,) the declaration is insufficient to support the action ; it not being stated therein that the slave in question belonged to, or was the property of the plaintiff, now defendant.” (1.)

Judgment reversed, and entered in favour of the plaintiff in error.

Footnotes

Kent v. Armistead, 4 Munf. 72, 18 Va. 72, 1813 Va. LEXIS 24 (Va. 1813).

Pincite

4 Munf. 72 (Kent v. Armistead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related