Kent Development Co. v. Liccione

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kent Development Co. v. Liccione

45 A.D.2d 959, 360 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4093

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 23, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A.D.2d 959 (Kent Development Co. v. Liccione) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kent Development Co. v. Liccione, 45 A.D.2d 959, 360 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, conspiracies and other alleged torts, (1) plaintiffs appeal from (a) portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered April 17, 1974, which inter alia denied in part their motion to strike defendant Gnerre’s interrogatories and granted in part defendant Gnerre’s cross motion to strike allegedly scandalous matter contained in the complaint and (b) two further orders of the same court, dated May 16, 1974 and June 3, 1974, which inter alia granted defendant Gnerre’s motion to add Margaret Alberi as a party defendant and imposed sanctions upon plaintiffs; and (2) defendant Gnerre cross-appeals from portions of said order of April 17, 1974. Appeals dismissed as moot, without costs, in view of the determination made in Kent Development Co. v. Liccione (45 A D 2d 965). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, conspiracies and other alleged torts, (1) plaintiffs appeal from (a) portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered April 17, 1974, which inter alia denied in part their motion to strike defendant Gnerre’s interrogatories and granted in part defendant Gnerre’s cross motion to strike allegedly scandalous matter contained in the complaint and (b) two further orders of the same court, dated May 16, 1974 and June 3, 1974, which inter alia granted defendant Gnerre’s motion to add Margaret Alberi as a party defendant and imposed sanctions upon plaintiffs; and (2) defendant Gnerre cross-appeals from portions of said order of April 17, 1974. Appeals dismissed as moot, without costs, in view of the determination made in Kent Development Co. v. Liccione (45 A D 2d 965). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.2d 959, 360 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kent-development-co-v-liccione-nyappdiv-1974.