Kent-Coffey Mfg. Co. v. Maxwell
291 U.S. 642, 54 S. Ct. 437
Opinion
This case, is controlled by the decision in Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Chamberlain, 254 U.S. 113, and not by the decision in Hans Rees’ Sons v. North Carolina, 283 U.S. 123. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kent-Coffey Mfg. Co. v. Maxwell, 291 U.S. 642, 54 S. Ct. 437 (1934).
291 U.S. 642 (Kent-Coffey Mfg. Co. v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. Bair
254 N.W.2d 737 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1977)
Mercury Motor Express, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Commission
135 S.E.2d 756 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1964)
Eastman Kodak Co. v. District of Columbia
131 F.2d 347 (District of Columbia, 1942)
Morton Salt Co. v. State
95 P.2d 335 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1939)
Commonwealth v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp.
8 A.2d 404 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Du Pont v. Deputy
22 F. Supp. 589 (D. Delaware, 1938)
Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. North Carolina Ex Rel. Maxwell
297 U.S. 682 (Supreme Court, 1936)
Turco Paint & Varnish Co. v. Kalodner
184 A. 37 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue v. . R. R.
181 S.E. 248 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State ex rel. Maxwell v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
208 N.C. 397 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)