Kent & Cahoon v. Laffan

2 Cal. 595
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 2 Cal. 595 (Kent & Cahoon v. Laffan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kent & Cahoon v. Laffan, 2 Cal. 595 (Cal. 1852).

Opinion

Heydeneeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court, Murray, C. J., concurred.

Section 229, of the Practice Act, declares, “upon a sale of real property, when the estate is less than a leasehold of two years unexpired term, the sale shall be absolute. In all other cases, the real property shall be subject to redemption, as provided in this chapter.”

I think the language of this act is sufficiently comprehensive to include within its design, sales of real estate under decrees of foreclosure of mortgages; a contrary doctrine might be held by ingenious and technical construction of that portion of the act which regulates executions upon judgments. But in all such cases I consider it safest to look to the obvious policy of the law, and to maintain such policy against a mere hesitation, caused by the inapt language of the act. This is also the application of the common law principle, which declares, that remedial statutes shall be beneficially construed.

The order of the Superior Court is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamilton v. Hamilton
154 P. 717 (Montana Supreme Court, 1916)
Turk v. Mayberry
1912 OK 150 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
North Dakota Horse & Cattle Co. v. Serumgard
117 N.W. 453 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1908)
Parker v. Dacres
130 U.S. 43 (Supreme Court, 1889)
Levy v. Burkle
14 P. 564 (California Supreme Court, 1887)
Clark v. Crane
57 Cal. 629 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
Stout v. Macy
22 Cal. 647 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
Gross v. Fowler
21 Cal. 392 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
McMillan v. Richards
9 Cal. 365 (California Supreme Court, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Cal. 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kent-cahoon-v-laffan-cal-1852.