Kensington-NY LLC. v. The City of New York

S.D. New York

Kensington-NY LLC. v. The City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 13, 2026·No. 1:26-cv-01057·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

KENSINGTON-NY LLC., Plaintiffs, 26 CIVIL 1057 (CM) -against- JUDGMENT THE CITY OF NEW YORK., Defendants. wee KX It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated April 10, 2026, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs are not entitled to injunctive relief. Perez v. Hoblock, 248 F. Supp. 2d 189, 201 (S.D.N.Y. 2002), aff'd, 368 F.3d 166 (2d Cir. 2004). Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary and permanent declaratory and injunctive relief is DENIED. Because the Court has consolidated Plaintiffs’ request for preliminary relief with a determination on the merits pursuant to Rule 65(a)(2), this ruling disposes of all causes of action asserted in Plaintiffs' complaint. The complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and judgment is entered in favor of Defendant the City of New York on all claims; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York April 13, 2026 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court

BY: DeputyClerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

KENSINGTON-NY LLC., Plaintiffs, 26 CIVIL 1057 (CM) -against- JUDGMENT THE CITY OF NEW YORK., Defendants. wee KX It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated April 10, 2026, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs are not entitled to injunctive relief. Perez v. Hoblock, 248 F. Supp. 2d 189, 201 (S.D.N.Y. 2002), aff'd, 368 F.3d 166 (2d Cir. 2004). Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary and permanent declaratory and injunctive relief is DENIED. Because the Court has consolidated Plaintiffs’ request for preliminary relief with a determination on the merits pursuant to Rule 65(a)(2), this ruling disposes of all causes of action asserted in Plaintiffs' complaint. The complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and judgment is entered in favor of Defendant the City of New York on all claims; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York April 13, 2026 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court

BY: DeputyClerk

Kensington-NY LLC. v. The City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2026).

Pincite

Kensington-NY LLC. v. The City of New York (Kensington-NY LLC. v. The City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related