KENSINGTON HEIGHTS COOPERATIVE v. Orozco

773 N.W.2d 903, 485 Mich. 933, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 2574
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 28, 2009·No. 139112·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

773 N.W.2d 903 (2009)

KENSINGTON HEIGHTS COOPERATIVE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Patricia OROZCO, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 139112. COA No. 289817.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 28, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2009 order *904 of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the district court's April 14, 2008 order granting a default and default judgment. In granting the plaintiffs motion to compel discovery, the district court placed the defendant on notice that she was subject to a default judgment for failure to comply with the discovery request. Such a sanction was reasonable given the facts of this case and the defendant's repeated failure to comply with discovery requests. Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion in entering the default judgment for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KENSINGTON HEIGHTS COOPERATIVE v. Orozco, 773 N.W.2d 903, 485 Mich. 933, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 2574 (Mich. 2009).

773 N.W.2d 903 (KENSINGTON HEIGHTS COOPERATIVE v. Orozco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Laketon Township v. Advanse, Incorporated
773 N.W.2d 903 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)