Kenrick v. Reppard
23 Ohio St. (N.S.) 333
Opinion
The general rule is, that a party omitting to examine or challenge a juror waives all objections to his competency. To take a case out of this rule, it is not enough merely to show the ignorance of the party, or his disbelief of the disqualification of the juror; and this rule applies as well to jurors summoned upon special venire as to jurors drawn from the box.
Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kenrick v. Reppard, 23 Ohio St. (N.S.) 333 (Ohio 1872).
23 Ohio St. (N.S.) 333 (Kenrick v. Reppard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.