Kenosha Hospital & Medical Center v. Garcia

2004 WI 137, 688 N.W.2d 462, 276 Wis. 2d 359, 2004 Wisc. LEXIS 828
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided November 4, 2004·No. 02-1727·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

¶ 1. {on motion for clarification). Richter Industries, Inc. petitions this court for clarification of our decision in Kenosha Hospital & Medical *360 Center v. Garcia, 2004 WI 105, 274 Wis. 2d 338, 683 N.W.2d 425, regarding directions upon remand. Specifically, Richter asks this court to clarify the directions upon remand as to whether Kenosha Hospital should be allowed to conduct further discovery to support its claim that the notice of motion for judgment against Richter was properly served. The court answers the question in the affirmative.

¶ 2. The motion for clarification is granted, without costs.

¶ 3.

LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kenosha Hospital & Medical Center v. Garcia, 2004 WI 137, 688 N.W.2d 462, 276 Wis. 2d 359, 2004 Wisc. LEXIS 828 (Wis. 2004).

2004 WI 137 (Kenosha Hospital & Medical Center v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winnebago County v. J.D.J.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2023
Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.
2007 WI 97 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2007)