Kenon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kenon v. State

701 So. 2d 887, 1997 WL 349805

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 1997

DocketNo. 96-1724

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 701 So. 2d 887 (Kenon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kenon v. State, 701 So. 2d 887, 1997 WL 349805 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

CORRECTED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, appellant raises a number of issues regarding both his convictions and his sentences. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that only one merits discussion.

Appellant complains that he should not have been convicted of both the enhanced offense of attempted second-degree murder with a firearm and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The state properly concedes error. State v. Brown, 633 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994); Cleveland v. State, 587 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1991). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and remand with directions that the trial court vacate that conviction. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CORRECTED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, appellant raises a number of issues regarding both his convictions and his sentences. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that only one merits discussion.

Appellant complains that he should not have been convicted of both the enhanced offense of attempted second-degree murder with a firearm and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The state properly concedes error. State v. Brown, 633 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994); Cleveland v. State, 587 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1991). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and remand with directions that the trial court vacate that conviction. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

701 So. 2d 887, 1997 WL 349805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenon-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack