Keno v. United States

230 Ct. Cl. 821, 1982 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 139, 1982 WL 25194
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedMarch 16, 1982
DocketNo. 524-81L
StatusPublished

This text of 230 Ct. Cl. 821 (Keno v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keno v. United States, 230 Ct. Cl. 821, 1982 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 139, 1982 WL 25194 (cc 1982).

Opinion

Plaintiff Christine Keno brings this pro se action against the United States for $275 million in compensatory and punitive damages. The petition contains rambling and unspecified allegations of a taking of property in Florida by federal, state, and local officials and private individuals who engaged in murder, fraud, embezzlement, theft, judicial cover-up, conspiracy, forgery and general criminal conduct.

At least five other cases raising identical claims have been filed by plaintiff in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia alone in the last 4 years. Four of these actions were dismissed as frivolous. A fifth such action was dismissed on the grounds of res judicata. On August 10, 1981, the district court restricted the clerk of that court in accepting any further pleadings from plaintiff.

[822]*822Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint in this case on four grounds: (1) that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations, having been described by plaintiff as arising on an unspecified date between 1895 and 1948 and thus running afoul of the 6-year period allowed by Congress for the filing of claims after the date of their accrual. 28 U.S.C. §2501 (1976); (2) res judicata; (3) failure to comply with the requirements of Rule 35 of the Court of Claims pertaining to the content of a proper petition; and (4) that the claim is frivolous.

Upon consideration of defendant’s unopposed motion to dismiss, the court finds that all of the defenses raised are established and that the claim is totally without merit.

it is therefore ordered, without oral argument, that the petition is dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiffs motion to restore case was denied April 27, 1982.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Time for filing suit
28 U.S.C. § 2501

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 Ct. Cl. 821, 1982 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 139, 1982 WL 25194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keno-v-united-states-cc-1982.