Kenny v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., No. Cv95 32 85 74 S (Mar. 14, 1996)

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 2149
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided March 14, 1996·No. No. CV95 32 85 74 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The motion to strike is denied. The defendant's special defenses allege limitations on the defendant's liability in accordance with the terms of the insurance policy issued by the defendant and as such, they are properly pleaded special defenses. See Bennett v. Automobile Insurance Company ofHartford, 230 Conn. 795 (1994), Palmieri v. Nationwide MutualInsurance Company, 9 CSCR 248 (February 16, 1994, Corradino, J.),Wicke v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, 1994 Ct. Sup. 4598 (Fuller, J.).

LAWRENCE L. HAUSER, JUDGE. CT Page 2150

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kenny v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., No. Cv95 32 85 74 S (Mar. 14, 1996), 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 2149 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 2149 (Kenny v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., No. Cv95 32 85 74 S (Mar. 14, 1996)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Palmieri v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., No. Cv93 522478 (Feb. 16, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 1601 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Bennett v. Automobile Insurance
646 A.2d 806 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)