Kenny v. Lange
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 06-JUL-2026 07:56 AM Dkt. 27 ORD
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI _______________________________________________________________ STEPHEN RICHARD KENNY, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
DAMARA HARA LANGE, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee. _______________________________________________________________ CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 2DSS-XX-XXXXXXX) ORDER (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Tonaki, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of Petitioner’s documents filed at
docket entries 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, and 25, which we
construe in part as motions for reconsideration, and the record,
it is ordered:
1. The motions for reconsideration are denied. Rule
40.1(h) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (eff. 2026)
provides that “[n]either acceptance nor rejection of an
application for a writ of certiorari shall be subject to a
motion for reconsideration in the supreme court.” 2. The appellate clerk shall not accept any further
filings from Petitioner in this case upon filing of this order.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 6, 2026.
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ John M. Tonaki
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kenny v. Lange (Kenny v. Lange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.