Kenny Kirby v. Edward Mier-Jedrzejowicz

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 5, 2015
Docket05-14-01117-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Kenny Kirby v. Edward Mier-Jedrzejowicz (Kenny Kirby v. Edward Mier-Jedrzejowicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenny Kirby v. Edward Mier-Jedrzejowicz, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Dismissed and Opinion Filed February 5, 2015

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01117-CV

KENNY KIRBY, Appellant V. EDWARD MIER-JEDRZEJOWICZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-03458-E

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By

postcard dated September 2, 2014 we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We directed

appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to

do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated September 2, 2014, we

notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant

to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so

might result in dismissal of this appeal. By letter dated September 18, 2014, we informed

appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of

payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written documentation that appellant had been found to be entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that

failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date,

appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the required

documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

141117F.P05 /Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

KENNY KIRBY, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-14-01117-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-03458-E. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. EDWARD MIER-JEDRZEJOWICZ, Justices Francis and Lang-Miers Appellee participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee EDWARD MIER-JEDRZEJOWICZ recover his costs of this appeal from appellant KENNY KIRBY.

Judgment entered February 5, 2015.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kenny Kirby v. Edward Mier-Jedrzejowicz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenny-kirby-v-edward-mier-jedrzejowicz-texapp-2015.