Kenny Eugene Kile v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 22, 2006
Docket07-06-00113-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kenny Eugene Kile v. State (Kenny Eugene Kile v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenny Eugene Kile v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

NO. 07-06-0113-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL B


JUNE 22, 2006



______________________________


KENNY EUGENE KILE, APPELLANT


V.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________


FROM THE 84TH DISTRICT COURT OF OCHILTREE COUNTY;


NO. 3929; HONORABLE WILLIAM D. SMITH, JUDGE
_______________________________


Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before this Court is appellant's motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant and his attorney both have signed the document stating that appellant withdraws his appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Mackey K. Hancock

Justice

Do not publish.

the compliance, and if not, a reasonable explanation for non-compliance. She was informed that failure to comply with the court's directive might result in dismissal. After appellant failed to respond, a second letter was sent on September 30, 2004, informing appellant that failure to comply by October 11, 2004, would result in dismissal of the appeal.

On October 12, 2004, this court received appellant's response, but the response does not include the information appellant was directed to provide. Because appellant has failed to provide proof that she has paid for the reporter's record or made satisfactory arrangements for the payment of the record as directed by the court, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(b) and 42.3(c).



Per Curiam

1. ' '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kenny Eugene Kile v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenny-eugene-kile-v-state-texapp-2006.