Kennon v. Vicknair
This text of 273 So. 2d 545 (Kennon v. Vicknair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case, which is consolidated with No. 9157, Vicknair v. Home Indemnity Company, 273 So.2d 542 (La.App., 1 Cir. 1973), is brought by Alphonso Kennon and Home Indemnity Company against Wesley Vick-nair for the recovery of damages suffered by them as the result of the automobile accident described in an opinion rendered this day in the consolidated case.
[546]*546Although no answer was filed by the defendant, the case went to trial without objection on his part, and he appeared and testified at the trial and was represented by counsel throughout. After trial on the merits, plaintiffs’ suit was dismissed and they have appealed. Defendant filed an answer to the appeal asking for damages, to which he cannot be entitled, not having reconvened.
For reasons assigned in our opinion in the companion case, the judgment is affirmed, at plaintiffs’ cost.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 So. 2d 545, 1973 La. App. LEXIS 6651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennon-v-vicknair-lactapp-1973.