Kenniston v. Blakie
121 Mass. 552, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 44
Opinion
Upon the facts of the case, as reported in the bill of exceptions, it being found that the plaintiff did not object to the form or the want of execution of the deed prepared by the defendant, and that the mortgage, to which the plaintiff objected, was in the form agreed on, the judge was warranted in finding that the plaintiff had waived all objections to the deed, and had unjustifiably refused to carry out the contract between the parties. It does not appear that any question of law was decided erroneously. Hxoeptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kenniston v. Blakie, 121 Mass. 552, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 44 (Mass. 1877).
121 Mass. 552 (Kenniston v. Blakie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kellogg v. Shushereba
2013 VT 76 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2013)
Great United Realty Co. v. Lewis
101 A.2d 881 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Caruso v. Pierce
48 Mass. App. Dec. 177 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1972)
State Ex Rel. Otto v. Field
241 P. 1027 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1925)
Hawkins v. Robertson
138 N.E. 92 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1923)
William James Sons Co. v. Hutchinson
90 S.E. 1047 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1916)
Hoskins v. Dougherty
69 S.W. 103 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1902)