Kennison v. Taylor

18 N.H. 220
CourtSuperior Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJuly 15, 1846
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 N.H. 220 (Kennison v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kennison v. Taylor, 18 N.H. 220 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1846).

Opinion

Gilchrist, J.

The covenant of warranty in the deed is limited to the acts of parties claiming under the grantor, but the action may be maintained upon the other covenants.

For the breach of these, the plaintiff is entitled to [222]*222recover the price of the land, whieh he bas paid, bis expenses in defending tbe action upon which be was evicted, including counsel fees among those necessary expenses, and a reasonable remuneration for bis personal pains and trouble in tbe matter. Loomis v. Redel, 11 N. H. Rep. 74; Haynes v. Stevens, 11 N. H. Rep. 28; Moody v. Leavitt, 2 N. H. Rep. 174.

But any measures that be bas seen fit for his own protection to pursue after bis covenantor bas come into court upon notice, and assumed the defence, are voluntary. If be choose to incur the expense, be cannot call upon tbe defendant for indemnity. The sum of $15 paid on this account must therefore be disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coco v. Jaskunas
986 A.2d 531 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 N.H. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennison-v-taylor-nhsuperct-1846.