Kenney v. Van Horne

2 Johns. 108
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1806·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After examinining the act for regulating fees>* &c- we are of opinion, that the costs of suing out the commissions, such as the affidavit, notice, and motion, drawing, engrossing, and sealing the commission, &c. may be taxed ; but the expenses of executing the commission, not being within the provisions of the act, are not to be allowed. The preparing or making up of cases for argument in a cause, is not comprehended among any of the particular services specified in the act. And unless it comes within some one of the services provided for by the act, it cannot be taxed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kenney v. Van Horne, 2 Johns. 108 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

2 Johns. 108 (Kenney v. Van Horne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Hughes
26 N.E. 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Barnes v. . Ontario Bank
19 N.Y. 152 (New York Court of Appeals, 1859)