Kenney v. University of Arkansas

653 F. App'x 487
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 27, 2016
DocketNo. 16-1270
StatusPublished

This text of 653 F. App'x 487 (Kenney v. University of Arkansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenney v. University of Arkansas, 653 F. App'x 487 (8th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kimberly Kenney appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of her pro se complaint alleging employment discrimination and claims related to state-court litigation. Following careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
653 F. App'x 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenney-v-university-of-arkansas-ca8-2016.