Kenney v. Murphy

302 U.S. 652, 58 S. Ct. 268
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 22, 1937
DocketNo. 31
StatusPublished

This text of 302 U.S. 652 (Kenney v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenney v. Murphy, 302 U.S. 652, 58 S. Ct. 268 (1937).

Opinion

Certiorari, 301 U. S. 677 (No. 909), to the Circuit Court of Kenton County, Kentucky.

Per Curiam:

After hearing argument the Court is of the opinion that the motion of the respondent to dismiss the- writ of certiorari should be granted, and the writ is accordingly dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. McKnight v. James, 155 U. S. 685; Lambert v. Barrett, 157 U. S. 697, 699, 700; Weldington v. Sloan, 54 Ky. 147; Broadwell v. Commonwealth, 98 Ky. 15; Proffer v. Stewart, 259 Ky. 445.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKnight v. James
155 U.S. 685 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Proffer v. Stewart, County Judge
82 S.W.2d 468 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1935)
Weddington v. Sloan
54 Ky. 147 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1854)
Broadwell v. Commonwealth
32 S.W. 141 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1895)
Lambert v. Barrett
157 U.S. 697 (Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 U.S. 652, 58 S. Ct. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenney-v-murphy-scotus-1937.