Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Kenney v. King

Kenney v. King

118 A. 634, 93 N.J. Eq. 688, 8 Stock. 688, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 352
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 20, 1922·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the finding of facts by the vice-chancellor and the propriety of the deciee based on those facts. The decree is therefore affirmed. ■

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, B,lack, Katzenraoi-i,. White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk — 14. .... For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kenney v. King, 118 A. 634, 93 N.J. Eq. 688, 8 Stock. 688, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 352 (N.J. 1922).

118 A. 634 (Kenney v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.