Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Kenney v. King

Kenney v. King

118 A. 634, 93 N.J. Eq. 688, 8 Stock. 688, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 352
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 20, 1922
StatusPublished

This text of 118 A. 634 (Kenney v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenney v. King, 118 A. 634, 93 N.J. Eq. 688, 8 Stock. 688, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 352 (N.J. 1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the finding of facts by the vice-chancellor and the propriety of the deciee based on those facts. The decree is therefore affirmed. ■

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, B,lack, Katzenraoi-i,. White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk — 14. .... For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 A. 634, 93 N.J. Eq. 688, 8 Stock. 688, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenney-v-king-nj-1922.