Kenney v. Evatt

59 N.E.2d 47, 144 Ohio St. 369, 144 Ohio St. (N.S.) 369, 29 Ohio Op. 541, 1945 Ohio LEXIS 469
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 17, 1945
Docket30170
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 59 N.E.2d 47 (Kenney v. Evatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenney v. Evatt, 59 N.E.2d 47, 144 Ohio St. 369, 144 Ohio St. (N.S.) 369, 29 Ohio Op. 541, 1945 Ohio LEXIS 469 (Ohio 1945).

Opinion

By the Court.

The notice of appeal to this court recites that such notice was sent by registered mail to the Tax Commissioner.

Section 5611-2, General Code, reads in part as follows :

“Such appeals shall be taken within thirty days after the date of the entry of the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals on the journal of- its proceedings, as provided by Section 5611-1 of the General Code of Ohio, by the filing by appellant of a notice of appeal with the Supreme Court of Ohio and with the Board of Tax Appeals. Such notice of appeal shall set forth the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals appealed from and the errors therein complained of. Proof of the filing of such notice with the Board of Tax Appeals shall be filed with the Supreme Court.” (Emphasis ours.)

The transcript of the record of the proceedings of the Board of Tax Appeals does not show that a notice of appeal was filed with that board as required by that section.

*371 The giving of notice of appeal to the Tax Commissioner did not constitute a compliance with the mandatory provision of Section 5611-2, General Code, for notice to the Board of Tax Appeals. See Johnson v. Sweeney, Secy. of State, 140 Ohio St., 279, 43 N. E. (2d), 239.

The motion is sustained and the cause is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Bell, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Genesis Real Estate Holding Group v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision
2014 Ohio 1724 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
A. Schulman, Inc. v. Wilkins
112 Ohio St. 3d 1208 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Mid-States Terminal, Inc. v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Revision
1996 Ohio 75 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Mid-States Terminal, Inc. v. Lucas County Board of Revision
666 N.E.2d 1077 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Duffy v. Hamilton County Board of Commissioners
637 N.E.2d 71 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1994)
Ahrns v. Board of Tax Appeals
259 N.E.2d 518 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1970)
Dixon v. Bowers
200 N.E.2d 646 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 N.E.2d 47, 144 Ohio St. 369, 144 Ohio St. (N.S.) 369, 29 Ohio Op. 541, 1945 Ohio LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenney-v-evatt-ohio-1945.