Kenney v. Burke

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Kenney v. Burke

61 Me. 134

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1873·Published

Opinion

DaNFORth, J.

The condition of the bond in suit has been broken, and the judgment of the court to which exceptions are taken is in exact conformity with its terms. A further stay of execution in the original suit does not affect or purport to affect tiie suit on the bond.

The defendants do not offer any defense to the present action, and they must abide their covenant voluntarily entered into.

Exceptions overruled.

Appleton, C. J.; Walton, DickersoN, and Barrows, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DaNFORth, J.

The condition of the bond in suit has been broken, and the judgment of the court to which exceptions are taken is in exact conformity with its terms. A further stay of execution in the original suit does not affect or purport to affect tiie suit on the bond.

The defendants do not offer any defense to the present action, and they must abide their covenant voluntarily entered into.

Exceptions overruled.

Appleton, C. J.; Walton, DickersoN, and Barrows, JJ., concurred.

Kenney v. Burke, 61 Me. 134 (Me. 1873).

Pincite

61 Me. 134 (Kenney v. Burke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.