Kenney v. Burke

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Kenney v. Burke

61 Me. 134

DecidedJuly 1, 1873

StatusPublished

This text of 61 Me. 134 (Kenney v. Burke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kenney v. Burke, 61 Me. 134 (Me. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

DaNFORth, J.

The condition of the bond in suit has been broken, and the judgment of the court to which exceptions are taken is in exact conformity with its terms. A further stay of execution in the original suit does not affect or purport to affect tiie suit on the bond.

The defendants do not offer any defense to the present action, and they must abide their covenant voluntarily entered into.

Exceptions overruled.

Appleton, C. J.; Walton, DickersoN, and Barrows, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DaNFORth, J.

The condition of the bond in suit has been broken, and the judgment of the court to which exceptions are taken is in exact conformity with its terms. A further stay of execution in the original suit does not affect or purport to affect tiie suit on the bond.

The defendants do not offer any defense to the present action, and they must abide their covenant voluntarily entered into.

Exceptions overruled.

Appleton, C. J.; Walton, DickersoN, and Barrows, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Me. 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenney-v-burke-me-1873.