Kenney v. Beardslee

Connecticut Superior Court

Kenney v. Beardslee

3 Conn. Super. Ct. 447

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedApril 6, 1936

DocketFile No. 48452

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Conn. Super. Ct. 447 (Kenney v. Beardslee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kenney v. Beardslee, 3 Conn. Super. Ct. 447 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

The Plea in Abatement is sustained on the authority of Mattoon's Appeal, 79 Conn. 86. While this may not be in keeping, in principle, with cases permitting the joinder of parties as defendants to prevent a multiplicity of suits, it must be remembered that this is purely a statutory proceeding, and as long as the statute remains the same, the reasoning in the Mattoon case will have to be followed.

The Plea in Abatement is therefore sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Plea in Abatement is sustained on the authority of Mattoon's Appeal, 79 Conn. 86. While this may not be in keeping, in principle, with cases permitting the joinder of parties as defendants to prevent a multiplicity of suits, it must be remembered that this is purely a statutory proceeding, and as long as the statute remains the same, the reasoning in the Mattoon case will have to be followed.

The Plea in Abatement is therefore sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Conn. Super. Ct. 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenney-v-beardslee-connsuperct-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack