Kenney v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.
This text of 57 F.3d 1082 (Kenney v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
57 F.3d 1082
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Jack S. KENNEY, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee for
Daisy Systems Corporation and Daisy/Cadnetix,
Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BEAR STEARNS & CO., INC., a Delaware Corporation, Bruce M.
Holland, Burton J. McMurtry, Carl D. Carman, F.
Gibson Meyers and Lutz P. Henckels,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-1170.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Feb. 9, 1995.
APPEAL REINSTATED; TRANSFERRED
ORDER
Kenney's request that this case be transferred to the 9th circuit court of appeals, and upon consent of Bear Stearns, IT IS ORDERED:
That the mandate is recalled, the appeal reinstated, the dismissal order of January 30, 1995 vacated and the appeal transferred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 F.3d 1082, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25658, 1995 WL 66830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenney-v-bear-stearns-co-inc-cafc-1995.