Kenney v. ALTICOR, INCORPORATED
This text of 761 N.W.2d 84 (Kenney v. ALTICOR, INCORPORATED) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Julie KENNEY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ALTICOR, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted in light of Stokes v. Chrysler LLC, 481 Mich. 266, 750 N.W.2d 129 (2008).
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would deny leave to appeal.
WEAVER, J. (dissenting).
I dissent from the order remanding this case to the Court of Appeals as on leave granted for reconsideration in light of Stokes v. Chrysler LLC, 481 Mich. 266, 750 N.W.2d 129 (2008).
Because I dissented from the majority opinion in Stokes, I would grant leave to appeal in this case to consider whether the Stokes majority reached the correct decision in Stokes.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., joins the statement of WEAVER, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
761 N.W.2d 84, 482 Mich. 1008, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 1957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenney-v-alticor-incorporated-mich-2008.