Kennett v. GRAHAM PACKAGING COMPANY

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kennett v. GRAHAM PACKAGING COMPANY

309 S.W.3d 872, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 608

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 11, 2010

DocketED 93842

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 309 S.W.3d 872 (Kennett v. GRAHAM PACKAGING COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kennett v. GRAHAM PACKAGING COMPANY, 309 S.W.3d 872, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 608 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Kennett (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming and adopting the decision of the Appeals Tribunal denying Claimant unemployment benefits. We find that the Commission did not err in affirming and adopting the decision of the Appeals Tribunal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Kennett (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming and adopting the decision of the Appeals Tribunal denying Claimant unemployment benefits. We find that the Commission did not err in affirming and adopting the decision of the Appeals Tribunal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 S.W.3d 872, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennett-v-graham-packaging-company-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack