Kennett Con. S.D. v. Chester Co. Asmt Pet: Autozo
This text of Kennett Con. S.D. v. Chester Co. Asmt Pet: Autozo (Kennett Con. S.D. v. Chester Co. Asmt Pet: Autozo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
KENNETT CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL : No. 150 MAL 2020 DISTRICT : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal v. : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court : CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF : ASSESSMENT APPEALS, CHESTER : COUNTY, PA : : : PETITION OF: PROPERTY OWNER : AUTOZONE DEVELOPMENT CORP. :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:
(1) Did the School District violate the requirements of the Uniformity Clause by subdividing real estate in the District based [upon] the money value [of] the property and imposing unequal tax burdens on properties with actual market value of more than $1,000,000?
(2) Did the School District violate the requirements of the Uniformity Clause by implementing an assessment appeal selection system which subjected only commercial properties to disparate treatment in operation and effect?
(3) Did the Commonwealth Court err by shifting the burden of proof and holding taxpayers to an impossible standard that this Court has specifically rejected, namely by requiring taxpayers to prove that the School District intended to discriminate against a sub-class of taxpayers?
[150 MAL 2020] - 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kennett Con. S.D. v. Chester Co. Asmt Pet: Autozo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennett-con-sd-v-chester-co-asmt-pet-autozo-pa-2020.