Kenneth Warren Riedel v. the State of Texas
This text of Kenneth Warren Riedel v. the State of Texas (Kenneth Warren Riedel v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00112-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
KENNETH WARREN RIEDEL, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva Order Per Curiam
Before the Court is appellant’s pro se motion for access to the appellate record.
On September 9, 2022, appellant’s counsel filed an Anders brief, and appellant has been
unable to examine the record in order to file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738, 744 (1967).
Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion. We order the trial court to ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before thirty days
from the date of this order. We further order the trial court to notify this Court as to the
date upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State,
436 S.W.3d 313, 321–22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record is first made
available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty days
thereafter to file its response, if any.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 20th day of October, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kenneth Warren Riedel v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-warren-riedel-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.