Kenneth W. Hackney v. Warden, Bland Correctional Center
This text of 52 F.3d 321 (Kenneth W. Hackney v. Warden, Bland Correctional Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
52 F.3d 321
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kenneth W. HACKNEY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, BLAND CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 95-6091.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 14, 1995.
Decided April 19, 1995.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-6)
Kenneth W. Hackney, appellant pro se.
W.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hackney v. Warden, No. CA-95-6 (W.D.Va. Jan. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F.3d 321, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17559, 1995 WL 231282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-w-hackney-v-warden-bland-correctional-cent-ca4-1995.