Kenneth W. Fernandez v. Budget Exteriors, Inc.

507 F. App'x 620
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 31, 2013
Docket12-2909
StatusUnpublished

This text of 507 F. App'x 620 (Kenneth W. Fernandez v. Budget Exteriors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenneth W. Fernandez v. Budget Exteriors, Inc., 507 F. App'x 620 (8th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth W. Fernandez appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Upon careful de novo review, see Kincaid v. City of Omaha, 378 F.3d 799, 803 (8th Cir.2004), we conclude that *621 summary judgment was proper. The district court correctly concluded Fernandez’s hostile work environment claims were untimely and that his retaliatory-discharge claim fails because Budget articulated legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for his discharge, which Fernandez did not show were pretextual.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

.' The Honorable Jeffrey J. Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Laura Kincaid v. City of Omaha
378 F.3d 799 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
507 F. App'x 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-w-fernandez-v-budget-exteriors-inc-ca8-2013.