Kenneth W. Arthur v. Uvalde County Appraisal District, Albert Mireles, Chief Appraiser
This text of Kenneth W. Arthur v. Uvalde County Appraisal District, Albert Mireles, Chief Appraiser (Kenneth W. Arthur v. Uvalde County Appraisal District, Albert Mireles, Chief Appraiser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 04-14-00533-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/19/2015 9:03:46 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
NO. 04-14-00533-CV
Fourth Court of Appeals 4th COURT FILED IN OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS San Antonio, Texas 02/19/2015 9:03:46 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE __________________________________________________________________ Clerk
BARBARA ARTHUR, individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Kenneth W. Arthur, et al., Appellants,
V.
UVALDE COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT et al., Appellees. ______________________________________________________________________________
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS ______________________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas Case No. 2012-04-28619-TX Honorable Watt Murrah, Presiding ______________________________________________________________________________
Benjamin R. Bingham State Bar No. 02322350 ben@binghamandlea.com BINGHAM & LEA, P.C. 319 Maverick Street San Antonio, Texas 78212 (210) 224-1819 Telephone (210) 224-0141 Facsimile
COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS, BARBARA ARTHUR, individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Kenneth W. Arthur, ENCINO LODGE CORPORATION, and CONCAN SOUTH PASTURE, INC. Appellants, Barbara Arthur individually and as Independent Executrix of the
Estate of Kenneth W. Arthur, Encino Lodge Corporation, and Concan South
Pasture, Inc. (collectively below “Arthurs”), file this Unopposed Joint Motion for
Extension of Time to File Appellants’ Reply Brief. Appellants ask the Court to
extend the time for filing their Reply Briefs in this appeal by fourteen (14) days
from February 23, 2015, to and including March 9, 2015.
FACTS
1. Appellants filed their Opening Brief on January 5, 2015.
2. Appellees filed their Brief on February 3, 2015.
3. Appellants’ Reply Brief is currently due to be filed on or by February
23, 2015.
4. Due to several previously scheduled professional commitments in
other projects on which counsel for Appellants are working, it will be difficult for
counsel for Appellants to file Appellants’ reply brief by February 23, 2015.
5. No previous extensions have been requested or granted by the Court
to extend the time for filing Appellants’ reply brief.
REQUEST FOR RELIEF
6. Accordingly, Appellants request that the Court extend the time for
filing Appellants’ reply brief in this case to on or by March 9, 2015.
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF Page 2|3 TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS 7. Certificate of Conference—Counsel for Appellants certifies by his
signature below that he has conferred with counsel for Appellees on this Motion,
and that counsel for Appellees informed him that Appellees do not oppose this
Motion or the requested extension.
Respectfully submitted, BINGHAM & LEA, P.C. 319 Maverick Street San Antonio, Texas 78212 (210) 224-1819 Telephone (210) 224-0141 Facsimile ben@binghamandlea.com
BY: /s/ Benjamin R. Bingham BENJAMIN R. BINGHAM State Bar No. 02322350 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, on the 19th day of February, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has been served by: United States First-Class Mail; Facsimile Transmission; CM/RRR; E-Mail; and/or Hand Delivery on the following: Albert M. Walker, Jr., Hymeadow Woods, Ste. 3-202, 12325 Hymeadow Dr., Austin, Texas 78750 Counsel for Appellees /s/ Benjamin R. Bingham BENJAMIN R. BINGHAM
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF Page 3|3 TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kenneth W. Arthur v. Uvalde County Appraisal District, Albert Mireles, Chief Appraiser, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-w-arthur-v-uvalde-county-appraisal-district-albert-mireles-texapp-2015.