Kenneth T. Smith v. the State of Texas
This text of Kenneth T. Smith v. the State of Texas (Kenneth T. Smith v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-23-00796-CR
Kenneth T. Smith, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-22-5046-A, THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant’s brief was originally due January 12, 2024. After this Court
granted two motions requesting extensions of time to file his brief, appellant’s brief was due
July 1, 2024. In granting the most recent extension, this Court advised counsel that no further
extensions would be granted absent a showing of good cause. On August 12, 2024, counsel filed
a third motion, requesting an extension until August 22, 2024 and providing substantively the
same explanation for delay given in his prior motions. He did not file a brief by his requested
date, and to date, the brief has not been tendered for filing and is overdue. This Court has
previously sent counsel three notices informing him that appellant’s brief was overdue. The
most recent, dated August 1, 2024, informed counsel that a failure to file a brief or motion for
extension of time by August 12, 2024, would result in the referral of this case to the trial court
for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Although counsel filed a motion for extension on August 12, 2024, he failed to make a showing of good cause, and
his requested date has since passed without his filing a brief.
The appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct
a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether
counsel has abandoned this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The court shall make
appropriate written findings and recommendations. See id. R. 38.8(b)(2), (3). If necessary, the
court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this appeal.
Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall order the appropriate
supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings and orders—to be prepared
and forwarded to this Court no later than September 13, 2024. See id. R. 38.8(b)(3).
It is so ordered August 28, 2024.
Before Justices Baker, Smith, and Theofanis
Abated and Remanded
Filed: August 28, 2024
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kenneth T. Smith v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-t-smith-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.