Kenneth Sherman, Jr. v. J. W. Caputo
This text of Kenneth Sherman, Jr. v. J. W. Caputo (Kenneth Sherman, Jr. v. J. W. Caputo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 25-13192 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 01/02/2026 Page: 1 of 3
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-13192 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
KENNETH JAMAL SHERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus
J. W. CAPUTO, OFFICER KEITH, Defendants-Appellees, A. JOHNS, et al., Defendants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 3:23-cv-00664-BJD-MCR ____________________
Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 25-13192 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 01/02/2026 Page: 2 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 25-13192
Kenneth Sherman Jr., an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a document titled, “Appealing this case and trying to Appeal it to the Best of my ability,” which we liberally construe as a notice of ap- peal designating the district court’s July 25, 2025 judgment. See Campbell v. Air Jam. Ltd., 760 F.3d 1165, 1168 (11th Cir. 2014) (ex- plaining that we liberally construe pro se filings); Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B) (providing that a notice of appeal must “designate the judgment—or the appealable order—from which the appeal is taken”); Rinaldo v. Corbett, 256 F.3d 1276, 1278-80 (11th Cir. 2001) (explaining that we liberally construe the requirements of Rule 3). The notice of appeal is deemed filed on September 9, 2025, under the prison mailbox rule. See Jeffries v. United States, 748 F.3d 1310, 1314 (11th Cir. 2014) (explaining that a pro se prisoner’s notice of appeal is deemed filed on the date he delivers it to prison authori- ties for mailing, but if that date is unknown and there is not con- trary evidence, the notice is deemed filed on the day that he signed it). The September 9 notice of appeal is untimely to appeal the July 25 judgment, as the 30-day statutory time limit required Sher- man to file a notice of appeal challenging the judgment by August 25. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a) (providing that, in civil cases where there is not a federal party, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the entry of the order or judgment appealed from); Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(1)(C) (providing that, if the final day of an appeal period falls on a holiday or weekend, the final day to appeal becomes the next day that is not a holiday or weekend). And the district court denied Sherman’s construed motion to extend or USCA11 Case: 25-13192 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 01/02/2026 Page: 3 of 3
25-13192 Opinion of the Court 3
reopen the appeal period. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)-(6). There- fore, we lack jurisdiction over Sherman’s appeal. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010) (explaining that the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kenneth Sherman, Jr. v. J. W. Caputo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-sherman-jr-v-j-w-caputo-ca11-2026.