Kenneth Shed v. the State of Texas
This text of Kenneth Shed v. the State of Texas (Kenneth Shed v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00256-CR
KENNETH SHED, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 140th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-2023-CR-1018 (Counts I – VII), Honorable Douglas H. Freitag, Presiding
January 8, 2025 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Kenneth Shed, appeals his convictions for indecency with a child,1 three
counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child,2 and three counts of sexual assault of a
child.3 Appellant was sentenced to seven life sentences to be served concurrently.
Appellant’s brief was originally due October 21, 2024, but we granted Appellant’s
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.11(a)(1).
2 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021(a)(2)(B).
3 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.011(a)(2). appointed counsel two extensions to file a brief due to counsel’s caseload. By letter of
December 3, 2024, we admonished Appellant’s counsel that failure to file a brief by
December 20 could result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial
court for further proceedings without further notice. To date, Appellant’s counsel has
neither filed a brief nor had any further communication with this Court.
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall
determine the following:
1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. whether Appellant is indigent;
3. why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant;
4. whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;
5. whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;
6. whether new counsel should be appointed; and
7. if Appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the Court may expect
Appellant’s brief to be filed.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by February 7, 2025.
If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has
been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel;
the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly
appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
2 Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before January 22, 2025, he is directed
to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall
not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kenneth Shed v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-shed-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.