Kenneth S. Benigni v. United States

141 F.3d 1167, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 13967, 1998 WL 165159
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 10, 1998
Docket97-3181
StatusUnpublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 141 F.3d 1167 (Kenneth S. Benigni v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenneth S. Benigni v. United States, 141 F.3d 1167, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 13967, 1998 WL 165159 (8th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

141 F.3d 1167

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Kenneth S. BENIGNI, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 97-3181.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 1998.
Filed April 10, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth S. Benigni brought a complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80. He alleged the United States Postal Service (USPS) failed to investigate a death threat he received in the mail; intentionally withheld his mail from home delivery on numerous occasions, requiring him to retrieve the mail from the post office; and never delivered to him certain weekly newspapers. The district court1 dismissed most of the complaint with prejudice, but dismissed the intentional-withholding-of-mail claim without prejudice. Benigni appeals.

As the district court noted, Benigni's failure-to-investigate claim was barred by the "discretionary function" exception to the FTCA, see 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a), and his loss-of-mail claim was barred by the postal exception to the FTCA, see 28 U.S.C. § 2680(b). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

1

The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Konan v. USPS
96 F.4th 799 (Fifth Circuit, 2024)
Hart v. United States
630 F.3d 1085 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 F.3d 1167, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 13967, 1998 WL 165159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-s-benigni-v-united-states-ca8-1998.