Kenneth Ryan Caplan v. State
This text of Kenneth Ryan Caplan v. State (Kenneth Ryan Caplan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Kenneth Ryan Caplan v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-16-00517-CR
Trial court case number: 1490442
Trial court: 262nd District Court of Harris County
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief concluding that the above- referenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). Appellant, acting pro se, has filed a motion requesting access to a copy of the appellate record for use in preparing a response to appointed counsel’s brief. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant also requests an extension of time to file his pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief. We grant the motion and order the trial court clerk, no later than 10 days from the date of this order, to provide a copy of the record, including the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, and any supplemental records, to the appellant. The trial court clerk shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the date of this order, the date upon which delivery of the record to the appellant is made. Appellant’s pro se response to appointed counsel’s brief shall be filed within 45 days of the date of this order.
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland Acting individually
Date: March 2, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kenneth Ryan Caplan v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-ryan-caplan-v-state-texapp-2017.