Kenneth Phillips v. Sewall Smith Bishop L. Robinson John Doe

59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23478, 1995 WL 370411
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 22, 1995
Docket95-6216
StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 167 (Kenneth Phillips v. Sewall Smith Bishop L. Robinson John Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenneth Phillips v. Sewall Smith Bishop L. Robinson John Doe, 59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23478, 1995 WL 370411 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kenneth PHILLIPS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Sewall SMITH; Bishop L. Robinson; John Doe, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6216.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 22, 1995.

Kenneth Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard M. Kastendieck, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant has filed a notice of appeal in his pending 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the record does not contain an appealable order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Appellant has not sought to appeal a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23478, 1995 WL 370411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-phillips-v-sewall-smith-bishop-l-robinson--ca4-1995.