Kenneth N. Hebert v. State
This text of 162 So. 3d 64 (Kenneth N. Hebert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing
Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for rehearing, we grant the motion in part and withdraw this court’s per curiam affir-mance dated June 12, 2014. The attached opinion is substituted therefor.
Kenneth N. Hebert appeals the denial of his amended Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. He raised two grounds within his amended motion. The trial court summarily denied ground one and scheduled ground two for an evidentiary hearing. That ground included two points; however, only the first was the subject of the evidentiary hearing and the order that followed. As a result, the trial court failed to rule on the second point within that ground. While we affirm the trial court’s disposition of ground one and the point addressed at the evidentiary hearing, we reverse and remand for the trial court to consider the remaining claim within ground two. See McClendon v. State, 862 So.2d 945 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). See also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(8)(C).
Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 So. 3d 64, 2014 WL 3928486, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-n-hebert-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.