Kenneth Morrison v. Gary T. Dixon Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina

902 F.2d 29, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 5947, 1990 WL 51856
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 17, 1990
Docket89-7790
StatusUnpublished

This text of 902 F.2d 29 (Kenneth Morrison v. Gary T. Dixon Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenneth Morrison v. Gary T. Dixon Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, 902 F.2d 29, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 5947, 1990 WL 51856 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

902 F.2d 29
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kenneth MORRISON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Gary T. DIXON; Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General of the
State of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 89-7790.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 1990.
Decided April 17, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Eugene A. Gordon, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 88-1087-D)

Kenneth Morrison, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Morrison seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Morrison v. Dixon, C/A No. 88-1087-D (M.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pasha v. Correctional Medical Services(cms)
902 F.2d 29 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
902 F.2d 29, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 5947, 1990 WL 51856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-morrison-v-gary-t-dixon-lacy-h-thornburg-attorney-general-of-ca4-1990.