Kenneth M. Robinson v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 15, 2024
Docket5D2024-1742
StatusPublished

This text of Kenneth M. Robinson v. State of Florida (Kenneth M. Robinson v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenneth M. Robinson v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 5D2024-1742 LT Case No. 2005-CF-002936-A _____________________________

KENNETH M. ROBINSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County. Heidi Davis, Judge.

Kenneth M. Robinson, Graceville, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

November 15, 2024

WALLIS, J.

Appellant, Kenneth M. Robinson, appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Appellant argues on appeal that the trial court erred in relying on certain predicate convictions to support adjudicating him as a Habitual Felony Offender. Appellant raised a facially sufficient claim for relief pursuant to Rule 3.800(a). The trial court’s summary denial of the claims without attaching any records fails to refute Appellant’s arguments. Consequently, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again summarily denies the motion, it shall attach portions of the record that conclusively refute Appellant’s claim. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D); see also Stewart v. State, 948 So. 2d 870, 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (reversing and remanding summary denial of rule 3.800(a) motion where defendant raised a facially sufficient claim and trial court failed to attach written portions of record conclusively refuting claim).

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stewart v. State
948 So. 2d 870 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kenneth M. Robinson v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-m-robinson-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.