Kenneth M. Flynn v. Raymond W. Kalb, Edgar S. Kalb and Esther Kalb Hancock, Co-Partners, D/B/A 'Kal-Han-Co.,' T/a 'Beverley Beach Club,'
341 F.2d 582, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6620
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 8, 1965·No. 9683_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The testimony warranting a finding of insufficiency of the supervision at this public swimming beach leaves a troublesome question of its proximate relation to the injury of the swimmer. The Court, recognizing its closeness, is of the opinion that different inferences might be drawn by reasonable men, and that the question was properly submitted to the jury.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kenneth M. Flynn v. Raymond W. Kalb, Edgar S. Kalb and Esther Kalb Hancock, Co-Partners, D/B/A 'Kal-Han-Co.,' T/a 'Beverley Beach Club,', 341 F.2d 582, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6620 (4th Cir. 1965).
341 F.2d 582 (Kenneth M. Flynn v. Raymond W. Kalb, Edgar S. Kalb and Esther Kalb Hancock, Co-Partners, D/B/A 'Kal-Han-Co.,' T/a 'Beverley Beach Club,') — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Keating v. Jones Development of Missouri, Inc.
398 F.2d 1011 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
Keating v. Jones Development Of Missouri
398 F.2d 1011 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)