Kenneth M. Flynn v. Raymond W. Kalb, Edgar S. Kalb and Esther Kalb Hancock, Co-Partners, D/B/A 'Kal-Han-Co.,' T/a 'Beverley Beach Club,'
This text of 341 F.2d 582 (Kenneth M. Flynn v. Raymond W. Kalb, Edgar S. Kalb and Esther Kalb Hancock, Co-Partners, D/B/A 'Kal-Han-Co.,' T/a 'Beverley Beach Club,') is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The testimony warranting a finding of insufficiency of the supervision at this public swimming beach leaves a troublesome question of its proximate relation to the injury of the swimmer. The Court, recognizing its closeness, is of the opinion that different inferences might be drawn by reasonable men, and that the question was properly submitted to the jury.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
341 F.2d 582, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-m-flynn-v-raymond-w-kalb-edgar-s-kalb-and-esther-kalb-hancock-ca4-1965.