Kenneth Leo Buholtz v. Gregg Gibbs and Charles Philips
Opinion
Order entered October 17, 2018
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00957-CV
KENNETH LEO BUHOLTZ, Appellant V.
GREGG GIBBS AND CHARLES PHILIPS, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 004-01275-2016
ORDER
The clerk’s record in this appeal has been filed, as has appellant’s brief. The brief is
deficient in that it does not contain the requisite citations to the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1.
It appears, based on a motion filed October 15, 2018, that appellant does not have a copy of the clerk’s record. In the motion, appellant, a pro se indigent inmate, seeks a stay of the appeal so that he can determine if the clerk’s record is “accurate.” He explains he requested, prior to the clerk’s record being filed, a copy of the trial court’s “Docket” for purposes of designating the items to be included in the record. To date, he has not received the “Docket.”
We GRANT appellant’s motion to the extent we DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a paper copy of the clerk’s record to appellant and ORDER appellant to file, no later than
November 19, 2018, either a motion to supplement the clerk’s record designating any relevant items omitted from the record or an amended brief that includes appropriate citations to the clerk’s record and otherwise complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c), 38.1.
/s/ DAVID EVANS
JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kenneth Leo Buholtz v. Gregg Gibbs and Charles Philips (Kenneth Leo Buholtz v. Gregg Gibbs and Charles Philips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.