Kenneth John Falcone v. Irene Connor Cynthia L. Aydlett Christian Loughran
This text of 73 F.3d 368 (Kenneth John Falcone v. Irene Connor Cynthia L. Aydlett Christian Loughran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
73 F.3d 368
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Kenneth John FALCONE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Irene CONNOR; Cynthia L. Aydlett; Christian Loughran,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-16583.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 19, 1995.*
Decided Dec. 27, 1995.
Before: SNEED, TROTT and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Kenneth John Falcone, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Arizona state prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. He contends that the prison officials violated his civil rights by enforcing a state court sentencing order which was subsequently held to be unlawful. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291, and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed July 31, 1995.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 F.3d 368, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40811, 1995 WL 761920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-john-falcone-v-irene-connor-cynthia-l-aydl-ca9-1995.