Kenneth J Terry v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kenneth J Terry v. State of Florida

207 So. 3d 1037, 2017 WL 469794, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1393

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 3, 2017

DocketCASE NO. 1D16-2711

StatusPublished

This text of 207 So. 3d 1037 (Kenneth J Terry v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kenneth J Terry v. State of Florida, 207 So. 3d 1037, 2017 WL 469794, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1393 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

BILBREY, J.

Following the revocation of his community control, Appellant was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment for the underlying offense of felony battery, a third degree felony. § 784.03(2), Fla. Stat. (2015). Appellant now argues this sentence is unlawful. Because the trial court did not make the statutorily required written findings, we agree.

Pursuant to section 775.082(10), Florida Statutes (2015), when a defendant, whose offense was committed on or after July 1, 2009, and whose scoresheet totals 22 points or less, is being sentenced for a non-forcible, third degree felony, then the trial court “must sentence the offender to a nonstate prison sanction” unless the trial court “makes written findings that a non-state prison sanction could present a danger to the public.” See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.704(29). It is not disputed that Appellant’s scoresheet reflected less than 22 sentence points. Nor is it disputed that Appellant was being sentenced for a non-forcible felony, as that term is defined in section 776.08, Florida Statutes. 1

The trial court did not make any written findings in support of the sentence, and therefore, we are obliged to vacate the sentence. The trial court may well have had good reason to find a non-state prison sentence would present a danger to the community given Appellant’s record, but written findings are necessary so that we can evaluate the sufficiency of the findings on appeal. See Jones v. State, 71 So.3d 173 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). Further, given the mandatory nature of section 775.082, we cannot overlook the requirement of a written finding, despite the State’s request that we do so. See Bryant v. State, 148 So.3d 1251 (Fla. 2014). Finally, we reject the State’s suggestion that any error was invited as the Appellant plainly requested a sentence less than prison. On remand, the trial court shall resentence Appellant to a nonstate prison sanction. Bryant.

Accordingly, Appellant’s sentenced is VACATED, and the cause is REMANDED for imposition of a nonstate prison sanction.

LEWIS and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.

1

. Counterintuitive though it may be, felony battery is not a forcible felony since a battery can be committed by touching another against the person’s will. See State v. Hearns, 961 So.2d 211 (Fla. 2007); §§ 776.08 and 784.03, Fla. Stat.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BILBREY, J.

Following the revocation of his community control, Appellant was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment for the underlying offense of felony battery, a third degree felony. § 784.03(2), Fla. Stat. (2015). Appellant now argues this sentence is unlawful. Because the trial court did not make the statutorily required written findings, we agree.

Pursuant to section 775.082(10), Florida Statutes (2015), when a defendant, whose offense was committed on or after July 1, 2009, and whose scoresheet totals 22 points or less, is being sentenced for a non-forcible, third degree felony, then the trial court “must sentence the offender to a nonstate prison sanction” unless the trial court “makes written findings that a non-state prison sanction could present a danger to the public.” See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.704(29). It is not disputed that Appellant’s scoresheet reflected less than 22 sentence points. Nor is it disputed that Appellant was being sentenced for a non-forcible felony, as that term is defined in section 776.08, Florida Statutes. 1

The trial court did not make any written findings in support of the sentence, and therefore, we are obliged to vacate the sentence. The trial court may well have had good reason to find a non-state prison sentence would present a danger to the community given Appellant’s record, but written findings are necessary so that we can evaluate the sufficiency of the findings on appeal. See Jones v. State, 71 So.3d 173 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). Further, given the mandatory nature of section 775.082, we cannot overlook the requirement of a written finding, despite the State’s request that we do so. See Bryant v. State, 148 So.3d 1251 (Fla. 2014). Finally, we reject the State’s suggestion that any error was invited as the Appellant plainly requested a sentence less than prison. On remand, the trial court shall resentence Appellant to a nonstate prison sanction. Bryant.

Accordingly, Appellant’s sentenced is VACATED, and the cause is REMANDED for imposition of a nonstate prison sanction.

LEWIS and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.

1

. Counterintuitive though it may be, felony battery is not a forcible felony since a battery can be committed by touching another against the person’s will. See State v. Hearns, 961 So.2d 211 (Fla. 2007); §§ 776.08 and 784.03, Fla. Stat.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 So. 3d 1037, 2017 WL 469794, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-j-terry-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack