Kenneth G. Geimer v. Samuel T. Pastrovich, Jr.
This text of 110 F.3d 530 (Kenneth G. Geimer v. Samuel T. Pastrovich, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
110 F.3d 530
Kenneth G. GEIMER, Appellant,
v.
Samuel T. PASTROVICH, Jr., et al., Appellees.
No. 90-2784EMSL.
United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit.
March 28, 1997.
Order Denying Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc.
Prior report: 946 F.2d 1379.
ORDER
Although inadvertent, the court recognizes its ultimate responsibility for the long delay in bringing Kenneth Geimer's suggestion for rehearing en banc to the forefront for a ruling on the merits.
Having carefully considered the matter, the suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied. Rehearing by the panel is also denied.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 F.3d 530, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 6096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-g-geimer-v-samuel-t-pastrovich-jr-ca8-1997.