Kenneth Franklin Henderson v. Albemarle-Charlottesville Joint Security Complex Al Tumminia Peggy Duncan Michael U. Jones R.E. Beauford, Jr.

Fourth Circuit

Kenneth Franklin Henderson v. Albemarle-Charlottesville Joint Security Complex Al Tumminia Peggy Duncan Michael U. Jones R.E. Beauford, Jr.

56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19102, 1995 WL 318450

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 1995

Docket95-6177

StatusPublished

This text of 56 F.3d 61 (Kenneth Franklin Henderson v. Albemarle-Charlottesville Joint Security Complex Al Tumminia Peggy Duncan Michael U. Jones R.E. Beauford, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kenneth Franklin Henderson v. Albemarle-Charlottesville Joint Security Complex Al Tumminia Peggy Duncan Michael U. Jones R.E. Beauford, Jr., 56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19102, 1995 WL 318450 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kenneth Franklin HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALBEMARLE-CHARLOTTESVILLE JOINT SECURITY COMPLEX; Al
Tumminia; Peggy Duncan; Michael U. Jones; R.E.
Beauford, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6177.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 25, 1995.

Kenneth Franklin Henderson, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Henderson v. Albemarle-Charlottesville Joint Security Complex, No. CA-94-974-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kenneth Franklin HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALBEMARLE-CHARLOTTESVILLE JOINT SECURITY COMPLEX; Al
Tumminia; Peggy Duncan; Michael U. Jones; R.E.
Beauford, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6177.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 25, 1995.

Kenneth Franklin Henderson, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Henderson v. Albemarle-Charlottesville Joint Security Complex, No. CA-94-974-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19102, 1995 WL 318450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-franklin-henderson-v-albemarle-charlottesv-ca4-1995.