Kenneth Eugene Dangbar v. United States

317 F.2d 660, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5186
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 24, 1963
Docket20201_1
StatusPublished

This text of 317 F.2d 660 (Kenneth Eugene Dangbar v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenneth Eugene Dangbar v. United States, 317 F.2d 660, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5186 (5th Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of the violation of 15 U.S.C.A. § 902(e), 1 interstate transportation of a firearm. A motion to suppress the evidence (the firearm) on the ground that it was illegally obtained was timely made and this appeal is from the judgment of conviction. The only point raised on appeal is the denial of the motion to suppress.

A careful survey of the record leads us to the conclusion that the court below was not in error in holding that there was probable cause for appellant’s arrest under the Louisiana vagrancy statutes 2 and that the search which followed was not unreasonable under the circumstances. Dicks v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 253 F.2d 713.

Affirmed.

1

. “(e) It shall be unlawful for any person who is under indictment or who has been convicted of a crime of violence or who is a fugitive from justice to ship, transport, or cause to be shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce any firearm or ammunition.”

2

. 14 LSA-R.S. § 107. “Vagrancy

“The following persons are and shall be guilty of vagrancy: * * *

“(5) Able-bodied persons without visible lawful means of support who do not seek employment; or * * *

“(7) Persons * * * who loiter around any public places of assembly without visible or lawful business; or “(8) Persons who are found in or near any structure, movable, vessel, or private grounds, without being able to account for their presence therein; * * *»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boston Dicks and Alfred Copeland v. United States
253 F.2d 713 (Fifth Circuit, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
317 F.2d 660, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-eugene-dangbar-v-united-states-ca5-1963.