Kenneth Duane Roy v. James Gomez John Van De Kamp and William Merkle
66 F.3d 254, 95 Daily Journal DAR 12850, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7705, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27522, 1995 WL 569656
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kenneth Duane Roy v. James Gomez John Van De Kamp and William Merkle. Read the opinion of the Court — 55 F.3d 1483 →
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this ease be reheard by the en bane court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kenneth Duane Roy v. James Gomez John Van De Kamp and William Merkle, 66 F.3d 254, 95 Daily Journal DAR 12850, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7705, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27522, 1995 WL 569656 (9th Cir. 1995).
66 F.3d 254 (Kenneth Duane Roy v. James Gomez John Van De Kamp and William Merkle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kenneth Duane Roy v. James Gomez John Van De Kamp and William Merkle
55 F.3d 1483 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Norman TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant
66 F.3d 254 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)