Kenneth Donaldson v. J. B. O'connor, M. D. And John Gumanis, M. D.

Fifth Circuit

Kenneth Donaldson v. J. B. O'connor, M. D. And John Gumanis, M. D.

519 F.2d 59, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13225

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 8, 1975

Docket73-1843

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 519 F.2d 59 (Kenneth Donaldson v. J. B. O'connor, M. D. And John Gumanis, M. D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kenneth Donaldson v. J. B. O'connor, M. D. And John Gumanis, M. D., 519 F.2d 59, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13225 (5th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This cause is now before us on remand from the Supreme Court, 422 U.S. 563, 95 S.Ct. 2486, 45 L.Ed.2d 396 “to enable [this] court to consider, in light of Wood v. Strickland, 1975, 420 U.S. 308, 95 S.Ct. 992, 43 L.Ed.2d 214, whether the District Judge’s failure to instruct with regard to the effect of O’Connor’s claimed reliance on state law rendered inadequate the instructions as to O’Connor’s liability for compensatory and punitive damages”. In the light of Wood v. Strickland, we hold that the district court erred in denying an instruction concerning O'Connor's claimed reliance on state law as authorization for Donaldson’s continued confinement. We now hold, as to both Doctors O’Connor and Gumanis, that the district court’s instructions were insufficient in defining the scope of the qualified immunity possessed by state officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Moreover, since the case was tried before the Supreme Court decided Wood v. Strickland, the interests of justice require that the plaintiff and both defendants, Dr. J. B. O’Connor and Dr. John Gumanis, have an opportunity to present evidence and to articulate their arguments on the issue of official immunity.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed insofar as the defendants were held liable for monetary damages and the case is remanded for further proceedings, if any, consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinions in Wood v. Strickland, 1975, 420 U.S. 308, 95 S.Ct. 992, 43 L.Ed.2d 214 and O’Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563, 95 S.Ct. 2486, 45 L.Ed.2d 396 [decided June 26, 1975].

It is further ordered that the defendants recover from Kenneth Donaldson their costs herein expended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This cause is now before us on remand from the Supreme Court, 422 U.S. 563, 95 S.Ct. 2486, 45 L.Ed.2d 396 “to enable [this] court to consider, in light of Wood v. Strickland, 1975, 420 U.S. 308, 95 S.Ct. 992, 43 L.Ed.2d 214, whether the District Judge’s failure to instruct with regard to the effect of O’Connor’s claimed reliance on state law rendered inadequate the instructions as to O’Connor’s liability for compensatory and punitive damages”. In the light of Wood v. Strickland, we hold that the district court erred in denying an instruction concerning O'Connor's claimed reliance on state law as authorization for Donaldson’s continued confinement. We now hold, as to both Doctors O’Connor and Gumanis, that the district court’s instructions were insufficient in defining the scope of the qualified immunity possessed by state officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Moreover, since the case was tried before the Supreme Court decided Wood v. Strickland, the interests of justice require that the plaintiff and both defendants, Dr. J. B. O’Connor and Dr. John Gumanis, have an opportunity to present evidence and to articulate their arguments on the issue of official immunity.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed insofar as the defendants were held liable for monetary damages and the case is remanded for further proceedings, if any, consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinions in Wood v. Strickland, 1975, 420 U.S. 308, 95 S.Ct. 992, 43 L.Ed.2d 214 and O’Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563, 95 S.Ct. 2486, 45 L.Ed.2d 396 [decided June 26, 1975].

It is further ordered that the defendants recover from Kenneth Donaldson their costs herein expended.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

519 F.2d 59, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-donaldson-v-j-b-oconnor-m-d-and-john-gumanis-m-d-ca5-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack